SUBSCRIBE   |   MY ACCOUNT   |   VIEW SHOPPING CART   |   Log In      
   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   SEARCH   |   SPONSORSHIPS   

 

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedInEmail a link to a friend
Monday August 06, 2012

Regulators See Strong, Public Pushback from Industry on Recalls

Other headlines in this week's issue of

PRODUCT SAFETY LETTER

 

To receive a free 3-week trial, click here

 

 

Congress Grills CPSC on CPSIA and Other Issues

 

Generators Remain Primary Cause of Tool-Related CO Deaths

 

NHTSA Study Finds Backseat Warning Alarms Unreliable

 

California, Washington State and Maine Move on Ingredient Rules

 

Adler Gets Demonstration of XRF Device

 

Northup Explains Views on Samples

 

Canada to Work on 2,700 Chemicals in Phase 2 of Management Plan

 

EU Gives Insights on the Need for Label Consistency

 

Nord Focuses on Testing Burdens

 

To receive a free, 3-week trial, click here

 

Three companies the week of July 30 publicly criticized the recall demands of CPSC and Health Canada. Two involved the U.S. agency’s efforts with loose, rare-earth magnets sold as adult desk accessories and similar adult amusements. The third, in Canada, involved strollers recalled there.

 

Maxfield & Oberton – against which CPSC filed an administrative complaint seeking a recall of Buckyballs and Buckycubes (PSL, 7/30/12, p. 1) – launched a social media campaign, Save Our Balls, that highlights its warnings and other efforts to keep the magnets from children. It includes a YouTube video, a Twitter hashtag, #SaveOurBalls, and a Facebook page. Details are at www.savehourballs.net.

 

Meanwhile, company President Craig Zucker appeared on a six-minute Fox Business News segment to discuss the situation. The company also placed ads in four Washington, D.C. newspapers: The Washington Post, Politico, The Hill, and Roll Call. The Post ad was a full-page, open letter seeking President Barack Obama’s intervention. The others reiterated the company’s warning label and marketing practices as well as giving its comparisons to other common items that injure children but do not get similar CPSC treatment.

 

Zen Magnets, a maker of similar products, issued an open letter to CPSC. In response to a CPSC demand for a recall, it accused the agency of taking unfair action to punish makers of such products and used phrase like “intrusive investigation” and “unusually harsh.” The letter also asserted that ASTM staff and a CPSC investigator who visited the company disagree with the agency’s actions. Read the letter at zenmagnets.com/index.php?p=1_18_CPSC_Press_Release.

 

Peg Perego Canada President Tony Castellano, in an interview with Postmedia News, charged Health Canada with inconsistent treatment of manufactures. He compared the agency’s insistence for a recall (see chart on page 4) along with a related Peg Perego recall in the U.S. (PSL, 7/30/12, p.1) to a similar situation in 2010 in which Graco recalled in the U.S. but Health Canada issued only an advisory with safety tips. He also suggested that the current recall in Canada was unneeded because incidents did not occur there.