Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedInEmail a link to a friend
Monday January 03, 2022

SaferProducts Submissions Increased During 2021

There was an increase in submissions in FY2021 compared to FY2020. That ran counter to recent trends, which saw a decline from more than 15,000 submissions in FY2015 to fewer than 10,000 in FY2020. A December 15 agency report ( estimated the FY2021 tally to be roughly 10,700.


Although most submissions still do not pass review for publication, eligible ones rose from about 30% during FY2020 to about 39% during FY2021. Indeed, the FY2021 portion was the highest since FY2017.


Other stories this week (plus a few extra)


A subscription to PRODUCT SAFETY LETTER is like adding a person to your staff to dig up must-know developments like these for less than $25 a week, and you learn of hundreds every year.


CPSC's Speed-up Trend Is Intentional, ICPHSO Attendees Hear


Use Compliance Program Guidance, Murphy Urges Companies


CPSA Authors Were Prescient, Suggests Hoehn-Saric


EU Toy Safety Updates Take Another Early Step Forward


UK Product Safety Brexit Review Likely in 2022


Canada Wants Input on Recycled Plastic Safety


EU Report Explains Common Charger – Safety Link


Briefs & Charts


CPSC Files Administrative Complaint to Force Leachco to Recall Podsters


Judge in Recall Case Deems Amazon to Be a Distributor


Online Toy Sellers Vary in Their Age-Grading Precision


SaferProducts Submissions Increased During 2021


Wearables Have Unique Risks for Intellectually Disabled


Commissioners Pass Crib Updates 4-0 in Section 104 Vote


New York Law Restricts FR Classes in Some Products


EC Plans Five Tactics to Support New Standards Strategy


Health Canada Gives Details on Four Enforcement Projects


Company Culture Is Among Topics of ACCC Reporting Guide


The report linked this increase to September 2020 updates to the public-facing part of the database. Better usability had been one of staffers' targets for those changes (PSL, 7/6/20).


Looking at FY2015-FY2021 trends, the top reasons submissions were unpublishable were failure to attest to accuracy (59%), failure to give consent to publish (7%), and failure to provide contact information (6%). Other reasons were products being out of CPSC jurisdiction, problems identifying responsible companies, lack of incident dates, product description deficiencies, and submitters' affiliations.


There also was a catchall "other" that was a tiny portion. Mostly unexplained, the report identified one such reason: the submitter being a juvenile.


The authors additionally noted that over the seven years, "A failure to describe the risk of harm accounted for approximately 10 percent of all reports and 15 percent of unpublished reports." A narrative description of an injury, illness or death is one of the eligibility criteria, but they did not explain why some deemed to lack it still get published.


In FY2021, the figure for unpublished reports that lacked risk descriptions was at about 14%.


Submissions from medical examiners are the top category of unpublishable submissions, representing about 61% of those in FY2021. Staffers suggested, "These reports are potentially eligible for publication, but seldom include all the required elements for publication in"


Many unpublished submissions nonetheless are mixed into the incident data available from the National Injury Information Clearinghouse.