Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedInEmail a link to a friend
Monday February 21, 2022

EU Report Explains Common Charger – Safety Link

Other stories this week (plus a few extra)


A subscription to PRODUCT SAFETY LETTER is like adding a person to your staff to dig up must-know developments like these for less than $25 a week, and you learn of hundreds every year.


CPSC's Speed-up Trend Is Intentional, ICPHSO Attendees Hear


Use Compliance Program Guidance, Murphy Urges Companies


CPSA Authors Were Prescient, Suggests Hoehn-Saric


EU Toy Safety Updates Take Another Early Step Forward


UK Product Safety Brexit Review Likely in 2022


Canada Wants Input on Recycled Plastic Safety


EU Report Explains Common Charger – Safety Link


Briefs & Charts


CPSC Files Administrative Complaint to Force Leachco to Recall Podsters


Judge in Recall Case Deems Amazon to Be a Distributor


Online Toy Sellers Vary in Their Age-Grading Precision


SaferProducts Submissions Increased During 2021


Wearables Have Unique Risks for Intellectually Disabled


Commissioners Pass Crib Updates 4-0 in Section 104 Vote


New York Law Restricts FR Classes in Some Products


EC Plans Five Tactics to Support New Standards Strategy


Health Canada Gives Details on Four Enforcement Projects


Company Culture Is Among Topics of ACCC Reporting Guide


Unsafe counterfeit electronic equipment, especially chargers, should be better addressed in the EU Radio Equipment Directive. That is according to a February review done for the European Parliament. Interoperability limitations exacerbate the problem – need for multiple chargers creates "additional consumer expenses that might incite consumers to buy counterfeit products," write ( the authors.


The focus of the review is a 2021 impact assessment on the EU common charger initiative. That work raises other related objectives such as better information for consumers and expanding the "pool of devices" being addressed.


In any event, although the earlier document leaves direct work against counterfeits for other initiatives, the reviewers deem the understanding of the problem to be comprehensive. That earlier document ( explained:

"Based on the consumer survey, it is assumed that 5-10% of all [chargers] bought separately in the EU, and approximately 10-15% of cables, are counterfeit. As regards product safety issues, 1% of survey respondents who had bought a non-bundled EPS or cable in the last 24 months reported it had caused safety issues (e.g. electrical shock, fire…), while 3% reported it had damaged their mobile phone. 5% of those who had bought an EPS, and 7% of those who had bought a cable, reported that it broke/became unusable shortly after it was bought. Existence of such risks has been documented by an analysis of the number of risk alerts for mobile phone chargers in the RAPEX and ICSMS systems. Overall, the RAPEX and ICSMS data, supported by feedback from authorities, suggest that there are problems with chargers and that these are increasing, although data in 2017-2018 does not confirm a clear trend. There appears to be a substantial market for counterfeit EPS and cables, which bring significant losses to intellectual property rights (IPR) holders, and could also constitute serious safety threats to users, and negatively impact the environment."