Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Monday January 10, 2022

New York Law Restricts FR Classes in Some Products

Other stories this week (plus a few extra)


A subscription to PRODUCT SAFETY LETTER is like adding a person to your staff to dig up must-know developments like these for less than $25 a week, and you learn of hundreds every year.


CPSC's Speed-up Trend Is Intentional, ICPHSO Attendees Hear


Use Compliance Program Guidance, Murphy Urges Companies


CPSA Authors Were Prescient, Suggests Hoehn-Saric


EU Toy Safety Updates Take Another Early Step Forward


UK Product Safety Brexit Review Likely in 2022


Canada Wants Input on Recycled Plastic Safety


EU Report Explains Common Charger – Safety Link


Briefs & Charts


CPSC Files Administrative Complaint to Force Leachco to Recall Podsters


Judge in Recall Case Deems Amazon to Be a Distributor


Online Toy Sellers Vary in Their Age-Grading Precision


SaferProducts Submissions Increased During 2021


Wearables Have Unique Risks for Intellectually Disabled


Commissioners Pass Crib Updates 4-0 in Section 104 Vote


New York Law Restricts FR Classes in Some Products


EC Plans Five Tactics to Support New Standards Strategy


Health Canada Gives Details on Four Enforcement Projects


Company Culture Is Among Topics of ACCC Reporting Guide


The first deadline of a just-signed New York State law (S.4630-B/A.5418-B) on certain classes of flame retardants (FRs) affects electronics displays and stands. Companies will have until the end of 2022 to identify any flame retardants used. Such products also will be subject to a January 1, 2024, ban of FR classes covered by the law – halogenated, organophosphorus, organonitrogen, or nanoscale.


January 1, 2024, also applies to a similar ban for new mattresses and upholstered furniture. On January 1, 2023, such a ban will affect activities like reupholstery and repair. There are exemptions, such as for stitching threads or certain barrier materials on the bottoms of one-sided mattresses. Details of exemptions are on page 3 of the law (, signed December 31 by Gov. Kathy Hochul (D).


Violators risks maximum fines of $1,000 to $2,500 per day, depending on the situations.


In a press release ( about signing the bill, the governor asserted, "[T]hese toxic chemicals have limited value, if any, in preventing or suppressing fires, as other states that have enacted legislation have not experienced more fires or new safety concerns associated with the removal of those chemicals from products."


Passage follows last year 's announcement by the state's Department of Environmental Conservation (PSL, 9/20/21) that it favored a class-based approach to organohalogen FRs (OFRs) for deciding reporting needs for children's products.


The agency said it was relying on work done for CPSC by the National Academy of Sciences, which suggested (PSL, 5/27/19) that treating OFRs as a single class would be unfeasible, but splitting them into 14 subclasses might work. The project stemmed from a petition granted by CPSC in 2017 (PSL, 9/25/17). It sought a national ban of non-polymeric additive OFRs in children's products, residential furniture, mattresses/pads, and electronics enclosures.


In mid-2020 (PSL, 7/6/20), agency staff explained that the resulting work was proceeding in seven broad areas involving a list of chemicals, scopes of subclasses, risk assessments, toxicity assessments, best practices, identifying OFRs used in consumer products, and lessons and suggested updates.


CPSC upholstered furniture work since was affected by a U.S. law (PSL, 1/4/21) to adopt California's TB-117-2013.