Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedInEmail a link to a friend
Monday January 31, 2022

Judge in Recall Case Deems Amazon to Be a Distributor

Administrative Law Judge James Grimes January 19 declined to dismiss CPSC's lawsuit to force a recall by Amazon, rejecting the company's position that it is not a distributor under the CPSA. This means the schedule of activities agreed to by both sides goes forward. First up are preliminary deadlines like filing proposed confidentiality orders (Feb. 3) or serving party discovery requests (Feb. 14).


Other stories this week (plus a few extra)


A subscription to PRODUCT SAFETY LETTER is like adding a person to your staff to dig up must-know developments like these for less than $25 a week, and you learn of hundreds every year.


CPSC's Speed-up Trend Is Intentional, ICPHSO Attendees Hear


Use Compliance Program Guidance, Murphy Urges Companies


CPSA Authors Were Prescient, Suggests Hoehn-Saric


EU Toy Safety Updates Take Another Early Step Forward


UK Product Safety Brexit Review Likely in 2022


Canada Wants Input on Recycled Plastic Safety


EU Report Explains Common Charger – Safety Link


Briefs & Charts


CPSC Files Administrative Complaint to Force Leachco to Recall Podsters


Judge in Recall Case Deems Amazon to Be a Distributor


Online Toy Sellers Vary in Their Age-Grading Precision


SaferProducts Submissions Increased During 2021


Wearables Have Unique Risks for Intellectually Disabled


Commissioners Pass Crib Updates 4-0 in Section 104 Vote


New York Law Restricts FR Classes in Some Products


EC Plans Five Tactics to Support New Standards Strategy


Health Canada Gives Details on Four Enforcement Projects


Company Culture Is Among Topics of ACCC Reporting Guide


Other highlights are a June 21 discovery cutoff and a July 18 deadline for motions for summary decisions. Opposing filing and replies are due August 8 and August 29 respectively.


Grimes writes ( that after resolving any such motions, he will set a hearing schedule. Most important, such sessions would be targeted to start 60 days later. This means that absent other resolution, the case most likely will extend at least into 2023 absent other resolution.


In rejecting Amazon's argument (PSL, 11/15/21) that it fits the definition of a third-party logistics provider rather than that of a distributor, Grimes' discussion included:

"The undisputed facts show that the consumer goods at issue were delivered to Amazon. In fact, that's part of how the Program works; the third-party sellers send their products to Amazon so that Amazon can store the products and then ship them to consumers. So the question is whether the third-party sellers delivered, or caused to be delivered, the products "for purposes of distribution in commerce.'"

After that, he asserts that the company does perform activities that fall under a definition of distribution in commerce, especially holding for sale and holding for distribution, both occurring after introduction into commerce.


He proceeds to knock down Amazon's logistics provider argument, which would give it safe harbor against the CPSC action. Highlights of his findings include:

  • Having a website that brings customers and sellers together goes beyond the "receiving, holding, and transporting" activities of a logistics provider.

  • So do processing refunds, decisions about returns, decisions about remedies, and its Fair Pricing Policy.