SUBSCRIBE   |   MY ACCOUNT   |   VIEW SHOPPING CART   |   Log In      
   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   SEARCH   |   SPONSORSHIPS   

 

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedInEmail a link to a friend
Monday January 03, 2022

Company Culture Is Among Topics of ACCC Reporting Guide

Other stories this week (plus a few extra)

 

A subscription to PRODUCT SAFETY LETTER is like adding a person to your staff to dig up must-know developments like these for less than $25 a week, and you learn of hundreds every year.

 

CPSC's Speed-up Trend Is Intentional, ICPHSO Attendees Hear

 

Use Compliance Program Guidance, Murphy Urges Companies

 

CPSA Authors Were Prescient, Suggests Hoehn-Saric

 

EU Toy Safety Updates Take Another Early Step Forward

 

UK Product Safety Brexit Review Likely in 2022

 

Canada Wants Input on Recycled Plastic Safety

 

EU Report Explains Common Charger – Safety Link

 

Briefs & Charts

 

CPSC Files Administrative Complaint to Force Leachco to Recall Podsters

 

Judge in Recall Case Deems Amazon to Be a Distributor

 

Online Toy Sellers Vary in Their Age-Grading Precision

 

SaferProducts Submissions Increased During 2021

 

Wearables Have Unique Risks for Intellectually Disabled

 

Commissioners Pass Crib Updates 4-0 in Section 104 Vote

 

New York Law Restricts FR Classes in Some Products

 

EC Plans Five Tactics to Support New Standards Strategy

 

Health Canada Gives Details on Four Enforcement Projects

 

Company Culture Is Among Topics of ACCC Reporting Guide

 

Having a good "compliance culture" is among the elements of a December guideline on mandatory reporting from the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (ACCC). This section includes advice to provide appropriate company staffers with a notice that explains reporting obligations, defines "serious injury or illness," and warns that reporting is required no matter the source, including news reports and social media posts.

 

There also is a list of sample questions for fleshing out the information that will be sent to ACCC. Most of them address incident scenarios and harms although others seek product identification and ensuring the company can contact the reporter for follow up.

 

There is a flowchart to aid in deciding whether to report plus a related checklist.

 

ACCC additionally urged creation of compliance programs, and the guidance (bit.ly/32D9AmT) has links to templates the agency created based on four company sizes ranging from micro-businesses to large corporations.

 

Other chapters address Australia's mandatory reporting law, who has obligations under it, types of incidents subject to reporting, those that are not, steps of the reporting process, and what to expect after reporting. There is a glossary.

 

The guide further includes advice for non-required reporting. This involves not only the now-standard advice from most regulators to err on the side of reporting. It also suggests that companies look at the incident scenario to assess near misses – situations that did not rise to death or serious injury/illness, but might should they recur. Also noted is potential worsening of current injury/illness.